I Am Niqabi: From Existential Unease to Cyber-Fundamentalism

نویسندگان

چکیده

Currently, niqabi women are more and visible, even in traditionally non-Muslim societies. However, there is a deep ignorance with regard to their worldview general about them particular. The aim of this paper, which based on research carried out using the Grounded Theory, give answer three fundamental questions: did belonging Telegram channel Orgullo choose become niqabis after experiencing some kind crisis or existential unease? Has grouping these said contributed polarization posture niqab way? Additionally, if that case, has fueled given rise ideology particular? One our conclusions, conducting 27 in-depth interviews, most opted for being Muslim response unease they experienced, somehow kept searching meaning lives. Another interesting aspect we have observed reinforced niqab, polarizing perception fundamentalist way. third conclusion cyber-fundamentalists, that, besides reactionary nature ideology, construct it modern

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

“I Am Who I Am”: On the Perceived Threats to Personal Identity from Deep Brain Stimulation

This article explores the notion of the dislocated self following deep brain stimulation (DBS) and concludes that when personal identity is understood in dynamic, narrative, and relational terms, the claim that DBS is a threat to personal identity is deeply problematic. While DBS may result in profound changes in behaviour, mood and cognition (characteristics closely linked to personality), it ...

متن کامل

Framing the Shape and Time of the Future: from Who Am I to When Am I

Fixing a watch does not mean one understands the future and understanding the nature of time, does not mean one can repair a watch. Fixing a watch requires technical skills and a theory of moving parts; understanding the future requires much more diverse skills; to begin with: an understanding and appreciation of theories of social change, cultural mythology, and the politics of epistemology. B...

متن کامل

Am I Right or Am I Right?

Though the value of a right should be not lower than zero, negative voting premiums often appear in recent empirical evidence. The present paper highlights some possible measurement errors and contemporary proposes a new measure, the vote segment, which incorporates all dividend privileges. Results from Italian non-voting shares listed in the 1999-2008 period show that the more accurate measure...

متن کامل

From Existential- humanism approach to Frankl`s Logotherapy

Without understanding the existentialist-humanist approach, one cannot know Frankel, the Analysis of Existence, and the Logotherapy. So, in this descriptive-analytic study conducted after studying various books and articles, firstly, we reviewed the three waves of psychology, namely psychoanalysis, behaviorism, and humanism. Secondly, the theory of "Abraham Maslow's self-actualization" and "Car...

متن کامل

I am not Prejudiced, or am I? Semantic Strategies Used by Ghanaian University Students in the Discourse of Ethnic Prejudice

Semantic strategies are a kind of discourse strategy that include the sum of language and cognitive moves which are used to reach an adequate goal of communication normally resulting in text comprehension by the reader or listener. Here, the language user takes a number of steps in order to perform a complex task. Semantic strategies in prejudiced talk have been examined extensively in western ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Societies

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['2075-4698']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc11020040